How to Stay Motivated in Telemarketing Outreach

[s.inf.o2.6.9]

The court’s decision hinged on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo which overturned a precedent granting deference to government agencies in interpreting laws under their jurisdiction. Per Reuters the appeals court stated that applying the Loper Bright decision provided grounds to curtail the FCC’s efforts to vacillate on the matter. The net neutrality rules first adopted in under the Obama administration require internet service providers ISPs to treat all data on their networks equally.

This prohibits practices such as blocking self employed data or slowing access to specific content and forbids preferential treatment for certain users or companies through paid arrangements. However these rules were rolled back in by the FCC under President Trump leading to years of legal and political contention. Read more: Federal Appeals Court Expresses Doubts Over FCC’s Authority in Net Neutrality Revival President Joe Biden has been a vocal supporter of restoring net neutrality and previously urged the FCC to revisit the rules.

In April the FCC now under Democratic leadership voted along party lines to reassume regulatory oversight of broadband internet and reestablish the open internet rules. However industry groups quickly challenged the move securing a temporary injunction while the case was under review. The court’s ruling has broader implications for the authority of federal agencies. As Reuters noted the decision reflects a growing trend in judicial scrutiny of administrative power particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s recent emphasis on limiting agencies’ interpretive authority.